Una presa male: un quotidiano manca l'obiettivo sui test prenatali

 
A worried looking couple looking at their phone, with the words "Response to the New York Times"
 

Il 1° gennaio 2022, il New York Times ha pubblicato un articolo, "When They Warn of Rare Disorders, These Prenatal Tests are Usually Wrong", sostenendo che i risultati positivi dei test degli screening genetici prenatali sono errati l'85% delle volte. L'articolo discute i cinque test di microdelezione più comuni e condivide storie personali di donne che hanno sperimentato paura e ansia, dopo aver ricevuto falsi positivi.

The article presents a skewed view of both screening and rare diseases, which has caused a storm on social media in the rare community. Genetic counselor Elizabeth Kearney joins the conversation, expertly addressing the article’s inaccuracies and assumptions.

Passate all'azione!


Ultime notizie da Know Rare

Elizabeth Kearney

Elizabeth Kearney, MS, CGC, MBA is a licensed genetic counselor and founder of Mainstream Genomics, LLC, which aims to help people who are pregnant or planning for pregnancy find the right genetic services for them. She is a past President of the National Society of Genetic Counselors and speakers nationally and regionally as a thought leader in genetic service delivery. Liz has a Master’s in Human Genetics From the University of Michigan and an MBA from Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University. She can be reached via her website or email.


https://www.mainstreamgenomics.com
Precedente
Precedente

Quattro cose da sapere sui registri dei pazienti con malattie rare

Prossimo
Prossimo

Organizzazione in primo piano: The PMG Awareness Organization